This website stores cookies on your computer. These cookies are used to collect information about how you interact with our website and allow us to remember your browser. We use this information to improve and customize your browsing experience, for analytics and metrics about our visitors both on this website and other media, and for marketing purposes. By using this website, you accept and agree to be bound by UVic’s Terms of Use and Protection of Privacy Policy.  If you do not agree to the above, you can configure your browser’s setting to “do not track.”

Skip to main content
Nicolas Rolland

Professor Emeritus

Anthropology

Contact:
Area(s) of expertise:
Prehistoric Archaeology; palaeoanthropology, anthropology of foraging societies; palaeolithic; prehistory economy and ecology; social life of ancient hominids; method and theory of Archaeology; Anthropological theory; Europe, Mediterranean, Temperate and tropical Asia

Impacts

Professor Nicolas Rolland influenced the theoretical landscape of Paleolithic archaeology by questioning the static, typological models that characterized mid-twentieth century thought. Prior to his work, the debate surrounding Middle Paleolithic (Mousterian) variability in Western Europe was largely divided. The discipline was split between the cultural-stylistic model championed by François Bordes—which posited that differing tool assemblages represented distinct Neanderthal cultural traditions—and the functionalist models advanced by Lewis and Sally Binford, who argued that assemblage differences reflected different site activities.

Beginning with his papers in Nature (1977) and Man (1981), Professor Rolland introduced a processual approach to lithic technology. He systematically quantified and demonstrated that morphological variation in stone tools occurred along a continuum rather than in discrete categories. By observing how tool edges were modified, he illustrated that what early typologists categorized as distinct tool types were often different stages in a single tool's use-life. A simple flake, for instance, could become a side-scraper, and with further resharpening, transform into a convergent scraper or a point.

This observation was developed further in his 1990 collaboration with Harold L. Dibble, "A New Synthesis of Middle Paleolithic Variability." The resulting framework, known today as the Rolland-Dibble (or Reduction) Model, directed the discipline's focus toward the "life histories" of artifacts. They argued that the typological differences found at various archaeological sites were largely a product of raw material constraints, tool rejuvenation processes, and the intensity of site occupation driven by shifting Pleistocene environments. By integrating European descriptive traditions with American anthropological theory, Professor Rolland provided a framework for interpreting Neanderthal behavior, environmental adaptation, and technological flexibility.

Key works

 Rolland, N. (1977). New aspects of Middle Palaeolithic variability in western Europe. Nature, 266(5599), 251–252. https://doi.org/10.1038/266251a0

 Rolland, N. (1981). The interpretation of Middle Palaeolithic variability. Man, 16(1), 15–42. https://doi.org/10.2307/2802008

 Rolland, N., & Dibble, H. L. (1990). A new synthesis of Middle Paleolithic variability. American Antiquity, 55(3), 480–499. https://doi.org/10.2307/281280