Nicolas Rolland
Professor Emeritus
Anthropology
- Contact:
- nrolland@uvic.ca
- Area(s) of expertise:
- Prehistoric Archaeology; palaeoanthropology, anthropology of foraging societies; palaeolithic; prehistory economy and ecology; social life of ancient hominids; method and theory of Archaeology; Anthropological theory; Europe, Mediterranean, Temperate and tropical Asia
Impacts
Professor Nicolas Rolland influenced the theoretical landscape of Paleolithic archaeology by questioning the static, typological models that characterized mid-twentieth century thought. Prior to his work, the debate surrounding Middle Paleolithic (Mousterian) variability in Western Europe was largely divided. The discipline was split between the cultural-stylistic model championed by François Bordes—which posited that differing tool assemblages represented distinct Neanderthal cultural traditions—and the functionalist models advanced by Lewis and Sally Binford, who argued that assemblage differences reflected different site activities.
Beginning with his papers in Nature (1977) and Man (1981), Professor Rolland introduced a processual approach to lithic technology. He systematically quantified and demonstrated that morphological variation in stone tools occurred along a continuum rather than in discrete categories. By observing how tool edges were modified, he illustrated that what early typologists categorized as distinct tool types were often different stages in a single tool's use-life. A simple flake, for instance, could become a side-scraper, and with further resharpening, transform into a convergent scraper or a point.
This observation was developed further in his 1990 collaboration with Harold L. Dibble, "A New Synthesis of Middle Paleolithic Variability." The resulting framework, known today as the Rolland-Dibble (or Reduction) Model, directed the discipline's focus toward the "life histories" of artifacts. They argued that the typological differences found at various archaeological sites were largely a product of raw material constraints, tool rejuvenation processes, and the intensity of site occupation driven by shifting Pleistocene environments. By integrating European descriptive traditions with American anthropological theory, Professor Rolland provided a framework for interpreting Neanderthal behavior, environmental adaptation, and technological flexibility.
Key works
Rolland, N. (1977). New aspects of Middle Palaeolithic variability in western Europe. Nature, 266(5599), 251–252. https://doi.org/10.1038/266251a0
Rolland, N. (1981). The interpretation of Middle Palaeolithic variability. Man, 16(1), 15–42. https://doi.org/10.2307/2802008
Rolland, N., & Dibble, H. L. (1990). A new synthesis of Middle Paleolithic variability. American Antiquity, 55(3), 480–499. https://doi.org/10.2307/281280