This website stores cookies on your computer. These cookies are used to collect information about how you interact with our website and allow us to remember your browser. We use this information to improve and customize your browsing experience, for analytics and metrics about our visitors both on this website and other media, and for marketing purposes. By using this website, you accept and agree to be bound by UVic’s Terms of Use for web and social media privacy.  If you do not agree to the above, you can configure your browser’s setting to “do not track.”

Skip to main content
Photo of Erin Ellerbeck

Associate professor & graduate adviser

English

Contact:
Office: CLE D335
Credentials:
BA (Victoria), MA and PhD (Toronto)
Area(s) of expertise:
Renaissance literature, Shakespeare

Erin Ellerbeck specializes in early modern literature, particularly drama. Her research interests include the history of medicine, science, and horticulture; gender and sexuality; Shakespeare on film; and performance.

Cures for Chance cover

Cures for Chance: Adoptive Relations in Shakespeare and Middleton. U of Toronto P. 2022.

 “Adoptive Names in Middleton’s Women Beware Women.” Studies in English Literature 1500-1900. 57.2 (Spring 2017): 407-26.

“Adoptés par des animaux: Les parents temporaires d’enfants abandonnés dans le Daphnis and Chloe d’Angel Day.” Enfants perdus, enfants trouvé: Dire l’abandon en Europe du XVIᵉ au XVIIIᵉ siècle. Trans. Béatrice Vierne. Ed. Janice Vals-Russell and Florence Magnot-Ogilvy. Paris: Classiques Garnier, 2015. 267-83.

“‘A bett’ring of nature’: Grafting and Embryonic Development in The Duchess of Malfi.” The Indistinct Human: Species Boundaries in Renaissance Literature. Ed. Jean Feerick and Vin Nardizzi. New York: Palgrave, 2012. 85-102.

“Adoption and the Language of Horticulture in All’s Well That Ends Well.” Studies in English Literature 1500-1900 51.2 (Spring 2011): 305-26.

“The Female Tongue as Translator in Thomas Tomkis’s Lingua, or The Combat of the Tongue and the Five Senses for Superiority.” Renaissance and Reformation 32.1 (2009): 27-45.